Saturday, October 31, 2015

Happy Halloween!!

There are a few moments in everyone's lives that define them; even set them down the path they are supposed to follow.  
Picture, if you will, a six year old girl who wants nothing more than to be hanging out with her older brothers (oh, and maybe she also desperately wants a kitten).  Against all odds she convinces them to take her along with their group of friends to the movies (I honestly don't know how this part happened.  Did the boys cave to her pleading? Did her mom say "go do something with your sister"?  Can anyone lend insight to this?).  
What they chose, in their infinite wisdom, was a triple feature of horror films.  They told their mother that they were taking her to a Shirkey Temple triple feature.  I'm stumped as to how the mother bought this.  Did she REALLY think her boys would sit through 6 hours of that precocious little moppet?  With their teenage friends??
Seriously, sometimes I think I grew up in the Twilight Zone. Or a sitcom.
Okay,  enough Rod Serling.  
The truth is  I ended up sitting on my brother John's lap the whole time. I was also convinced that Dracula lived in our backyard under the fake fountain.  Our mom was PISSED.
So for this post, I'm going to re-watch the films I saw on that fateful day!  I thought about trying to make my experience as authentic as possible, but at this stage of our lives, I'm pretty sure I'd be more apt to snap my brother's femur than look adorable sitting in his lap.  
So let's just start.

Dracula Has Risen From the Grave - released in 1968
I have a specific memory from each film I saw that day  These images have stayed with me for many, many years.  My Dracula memory was a dead woman's torso falling out of a church bell upside down; two drips of blood slowly meandering down her neck toward her chin.  Imagine my surprise that this shot is actually in this film!  Right at the beginning, too!  
As an adult, I can tell you - this is a pretty awful movie.  I mean, it's a Hammer Film, so you already know that the blood is going to look like bright red food coloring (check!) and there will be a lot of it (check!).  I was reading up a bit about the production company.  Hammer was kind of ahead of their time in the Gothic Horror movie realm, although it appears that even the internal folks were like "yeesh, these movies have A LOT of violence in them!"  What I certainly didn't realize as a 6 year old movie novice (horror or otherwise), is that the acting is TERRIBLE.  I'm talking really, really bad.  There is a "mute boy" who couldn't look more like he doesn't know how to act without speaking, and the (sort of) hero is a douchey English chap with a decidedly Roger Daltrey look to him.  SO 60's.  Everyone's makeup is thick with a weird gray shadowing, too, which is disconcerting.
Christopher Lee, of course, plays Drac.  He only has about 5 lines in the whole film and there are a LOT of shots of his bloodshot red eyes.  I have this issue, too, Drac.  It's called Dry Eye.  My fantastic optometrist, Dr. Carrie Lee, would suggest you use Refresh drops daily.  Seriously, you clearly have a pretty advanced case, dude.  Do yourself a favor and don't wear your contacts for so many hours in a row. 
I'd try to tell you about the story, but there really wasn't one. There's a Monsignor who's trying to save a village from Dracula but accidentally unearths him.  There's a super wimpy priest who ends up being Dracula's new Renfield and naturally the busty barmaid is the first to get bit.  Christopher Lee gets to overact heartily in his death scene, so I guess all the elements are there.  I was really hoping he'd turn into a bat at some point, but no such luck.
(My drink pairing for this film is a Bloody Mary.  Duh!)

Frankenstein Must Be Destroyed - released in 1969
6 year old Sue remembers this scene:  It's the end.  There is a big fire in the house that Frankenstein lives in and the monster and the doctor are fighting.  Someone stabs the monster with a butter knife!  Ouch!  Who knew butter knives were so lethal??  Everyone dies.
Okay.  So now I've watched this as an adult for the first time since I was 6.   At some point in my teens or early 20's, I realized that what I thought was a butter knife was, in fact, a scalpel.  And the actual "scene" is more like 4 or 5 that blended together in my young mind.  So our sort-of heroine stabs (non-lethally) the monster about 15 minutes before the end of the film.  He is a sensitive monster, of course.  We all know that Frankenstein-the-doctor is the actual monster.  His creation didn't ASK to be created and in every incarnation of the story he feels pretty gypped by the whole deal.  It constantly impresses me that Mary Shelley wrote the original story in the 1816, all because she and her privileged friends were bored one summer.  Go Mary!  I think she won that contest!  Also, it's lauded as the first true science fiction novel.  Score one for the females!
Anyway, post stabbing, our monster in this film goes around and talks to his wife and tries to be philosophical and stuff.  6 year old Sue probably only heard "blah blah blah" when the monster was all weepy at his wife about what happened to him.  Even at a young age, I bet I was like "Quit your whining, let's move this shit along".  Eventually there is a big fire but all the butter knife (scalpel) hullaballoo was way over.  Not sure what I was thinking, but I'm gonna cut myself some slack because I was SIX and it was the last 10 minutes of the third movie in a row.
Upon adult viewing, I'll say that this movie was a lot more exciting than Hammer's above Dracula offering.  There is a lot of violence in this film, actually, and not the kind you would expect.  Peter Cushing plays Baron Frankenstein and he's super fucked up.  There is actually a rape scene where he attacks the sort-of heroine.  
The Cliff Notes version of this story is the Baron and his science buddy were doing all sorts of awful experiments on people and the buddy went crazy.  The Baron essentially kidnaps a young doctor (also with a decidedly 60's Mod look) and his fiance (our sort-of heroine), blackmailing them because they've been dealing illegal drugs (wha?) that the doctor stole from the asylum he works at (um, ok.).  The asylum houses the ex-buddy. The Baron transfers the ex-buddy's brain to another body when he dies and hilarity ensues.
This movie is very dark and kind of well written.  The acting, again, leaves A LOT to be desired, but Peter Cushing is pretty much awesome. I kept expecting him to give the orders to fire when ready on Alderaan, but maybe that's just me.  And, to his credit, it actually appears that he ate a sandwich or two during the 60's, although you could still slice or dice something with those crazy cheekbones.  In fact, this was made only a handful of years before Star Wars, so perhaps he did some Weight Watchers or juice cleanses before filming commenced in order to look exactly like a skeleton.
(My drink pairing for this film is a Starbuck's Franken Frappuccino...apparently only available from the 29th thru the 31st.  http://www.foodbeast.com/news/this-is-starbucks-new-halloween-drink-the-franken-frappuccino/)

SHE - released in 1965
Here's another one where my memory seemed so clear but wasn't quite on the mark.  The scene I remember is an immortal prince walking thru fire and aging more each time he passes through the flames.  Eventually he becomes a skeleton and disintegrates.  That's not exactly what happens in this movie (in fact, I'm pretty sure I saw that exact scene in a different movie...maybe a Harryhausen film?).  I also remember being excited about this movie because SHE are my initials, so in little kid self absorption I was positive I was gonna like this one! This was the second film of the three, a bit of a breather film.  For a long while it seemed pretty innocuous, there's a lot of exposition and a bit of a "love" story. In the end, I tbink this one scared me too, though.
Upon adult viewing, I'd be surprised if 6 year old Sue didn't sleep through most of this movie.  There is an interminable amount of  time where our hero and his friends cross a desert.  Just get there already!  It went on for so long that I got dehydrated just watching the film!  
It's another In the Hammer oeuvre (although that's a lofty word for what Hammer does); an adaptation of the H. Rider Haggard story.  Apparently old H wrote a ton of stuff and hung out with Rudyard Kipling, but is really only known for two stories: SHE and King Solomon's Mines.  Judging by this story, I'm guessing H has some issues around women.  SHE is really called She Who Must Be Obeyed and honestly she's pretty much a c*nt.  Ursula Andress plays SHE in all her gorgeousness and bitchiness.  Hammer favorites Petrr Cushing and Christopher Lee are in this as well.  Christopher Lee gets another fantasticly over-acted death scene and Peter Cushing gets some nice ironic overshadowing by saying the line  "Nothing is gained by fear and terror."  SO not the philosophy of Grand Moff Tarkin.
The basic story is that SHE is immortal and searching for her long dead love. She finds the guy's doppelgänger centuries later and hypnotizes him to come to her in the desert.  There is also the possibility of treasure, so his war buddies accompany him.  Through the desert.  For like 15 or 20 minutes of film.  Zzzz.  The hero is pretty much a douche (a Hammer hero theme) and not only falls for SHE but also messes around with a slave girl.  He discovers that SHE killed the original dude in a crime of passion (TOTAL C U Next Tuesday move).  The modern douche totally thinks with his dick, so apparently this doesn't concern him too much.  He gets caught smooching the slave and so SHE kills the slave and makes him immortal in this crazy fire that becomes magic only once in a great while (she's been alone a LONG time and clearly makes poor choices).  She also goes in the fire, but apparently no one told her that going in the fire a second time reverses the immortal effects.  Oops.  It turn out she is the one who stands in the fire and quickly ages until she's a pile of dust.  The modern douche realizes that thinking solely with the little head usually ends up badly and vows to watch the flame until he gets an opportunity to reverse his own immortality.  
In the end, it never would have worked anyway. SHE wanted everlasting love and he just wanted to get laid.
(My drink pairing for this film is a Flaming Zombie, because it's alcohol, it's on fire and it's Halloween!)

My takeaways:
#1- A Hammer Film triple feature and a Shirley Temple triple feature could not be more polar opposites.
#2- I forgot to mention, there is a belly dance scene in SHE!  Peter Cushing even gets up to dance with the girls!!  It's like the Skeleton Dance in Silly Symphonies!
#3- If anyone is ever on Wunderlich Dr in San Jose, will you check and see how Dracula is doing in my old backyard?  

xoxo...hashtagSueslife

Monday, October 19, 2015

Shit I watched on the plane

Alternate title:  I've HAD it with these motherfuckin' movies on this motherfuckin' plane!!  Really, I couldn't pass up the obvious joke, now could I?

So as many (or all) of you know, I was on two incredibly long flights and one short one over the last couple weeks (I think I totaled about 50 in-air hours).  It was like a movie-watching goldmine!  Emirates had a zillion films I could choose from.  You will see from my entry today that sometimes I did not choose...wisely.

So here is my film itinerary, just a couple lines per movie so you get the gist. Cuz sometimes that's all you need.

USA to AUS
Jurassic World - released in 2015
I'm not gonna deny it...I love me some Chris Pratt.  This movie was a perfect plane movie....funny, charming leading man, great special FX that were visually big  and an easy storyline to keep track of (Dinosaur runs around. Everyone acts scared).
Thumbs up!

Ant Man - released in 2015
I'd say meh to this.  I love Paul Rudd but even his charm couldn't really do it for me in this film.  Also, what is Michael Douglas now, 1000 years old?  Whoa. My favorite part was Ant Man's friend, Luis.  He's this street-wise gangster type dude who is really funny.  His vocal cadence and demeanor, apparently, were taken from a "friend of a friend" of the actor Michael Pena.  Worth the free viewing.  Slept through a bit of it.
Thumbs middle.

Asterix:  The Land of the Gods - released in 2014
To be honest, I don't even know if this is the one I saw...I can't remember.  I'm assuming it is because via Google I discovered that it's the most recent Asterix offering.  I slept through almost the whole thing.  I saw enough to know that I am not a fan of the animation style.
Thumbs zzzz.

Pitch Perfect 2 - released in 2015
I liked this one!  It was funny and kept my attention on the plane.  As usual, I especially love Elizabeth Banks and John Michael Higgins as the emcees (and our eternal Greek chorus).  They play off each other brilliantly, in fact I think they provided me with some actual LOL moments.  Which is always awesome when you're sitting alone on a plane.
Thumbs up!

Jupiter Ascending - released in 2015
While I did not for ONE SECOND buy the love story aspect between Mila Kunis and Channing Tatum (and she's with Ashton so I'm willing to buy a lot), I was entertained by this movie.  Eddie Redmayne played an evil guy and honestly his talents were wasted on this film.  His acting "style" seemed to basically consist of "sound like you have laryngitis".  I know he can do better than that.  This movie was also incredibly long.  I think there were at least two plot points they could have lost and I wouldn't have minded.
Thumbs middle.

MELBOURNE to PERTH
Tomorrowland - released in 2015
This was on a quick flight in the middle of my trip.
I wanted to like this...I really did. I mean, it's directed by Brad Bird for crying out loud!  The Incredibles!   But, meh.  Clooney seemed to phone it in a bit.  The kids were good but the one little girl was doll-like (for good reason, which I won't spoil if you haven't seen it) so you can imagine how I felt. And Hugh Laurie was just a bit weird.  Additionally, this also could have benefitted with a good trim.
Thumbs middle.

AUS to USA
Hot Pursuit - released in 2015
Holy shit.  I can't even with this one.  Reese Witherspoon and Sofia Vergara, what the FUCK were you thinking??  Abysmal.
Thumbs all the way down.

Ex Machina - released in 2015
I've been wanting to watch this for a while.  Watching it on a plane was definitely not the best venue but I still liked it a lot.  It's a moody, atmospheric film with only 3 main characters. Everyone gave stellar performances.  It's a quiet film that I think will stay with me for a while.  I have to say, I've become a fan of the main actor, Domhnall Gleeson.  Check out About Time if you haven't already seen it.  It's a lovely film, too. (fun fact:  his dad is Brendan Gleeson (MadEye Moody) and they were both in Deathly Hallows together because he played Bill Wesley!)
Thumbs up!

I know this doesn't seem like a lot for my flight home but on the first leg I had a row to myself (sweet, sweet stretched out sleep) and I also watched a couple films that are going to get their own entry next month.

(My drink pairing suggestion for any of these films is a tiny bottle of your favorite hooch and A LOT of water.  It's important to keep hydrated on a plane.)

My takeaways:
#1 - I've discovered that on a flight there are films you need to sacrifice to Morpheus.  I call them Sleeper Films.  I did this with Toy Story on my way home (sorry Pixar).  You put it on and it blocks out the sounds of airplane and crying children.  Bliss.
#2 - I guess I never realized (or maybe it's because of the specific airline?) that swear words are bleeped out of movies on airplanes. Silly. You can barely hear it anyway so what's the point?
#3 - Another fun fact:  Keegan-Michael Key was in Pitch Perfect 2 AND Tomorrowland.  He was definitely a treat in both films!  Glad to see he's getting some big screen time!

xoxo...hashtagSueslife

Thursday, October 1, 2015

Who's on First?

Hey gang!

It’s a natural human condition to pick a thing you love above all others then fiercely defend it to those with differing opinions.  Such is the case with Doctor Who.
Linda and I are both late bloomers when it comes to the Doctor.  We discovered him (oddly at about the same time) through the new incarnation of the series.  There were already 7 seasons of new Who at that point, so neither of us have had the chance to explore the original doctors yet.  So just know that Linda and I are only revue-ing the Ninth through Twelfth doctors.  We are, in no way, dissing the former doctors, we just can’t speak to them.
That being said, we are girls with opinions and we like Who we like.  We've been discussing the Doctors as we've been watching, and now we want to share that with you guys.
Also:  there are some spoilers below if you haven’t watched any Doctor Who.  Read at your own risk.
It is with great pleasure that I introduce my Blogguest, Linda Moore.  Arguably, the most interesting woman in the world.  

Linda:  Thanks for inviting me!  If only we were together and drinking while we do this.  Of course it would never get done, or be hi-larry-us, but only to us.  

Sue:  Amen, Sister!

LM:  As Sue mentioned, I do not consider myself a sci fi (or syfy) fan, so completely wrote off the Dr. Who phenom when it started.  I can’t say what made me start to watch other than pressure from Netflix, and a long sewing project looming in my future.  I figured a couple of episodes could keep me company while I worked.
I was not hooked on the first episode.  There were mannequins and I couldn’t follow the storyline, but Netflix kept playing and so I stuck with it.  I’ve been a Whovian ever since.  But not one of those rabid kind that actually know all the rules of being a Doctor and remember the names of the enemies and keep it all in sequence.  That hurts too much.  I like the arc of the stories, and the characters and the silly lines (“it’s a timey wimey thing”).

SHE:  I actually did like the first episode (mannequins…creepy!!).  I fully agree about not being able to keep the entire Who universe (Whoniverse?) straight, but each Doctor has been compelling in a different way.  I love the idea of getting a variety of actors and character interpretation within the same world.  The element that KILLS ME about this show are the Dalaks.  Clearly they were designed in an era of low budget/no cgi television.  I know they are representing a sort of Nazi-like enemy in their single-minded pursuit of extermination, but a giant tin can with a toilet plunger arm?  C’mon guys…we couldn’t upgrade when we moved into the new millennium??  

LM:  Let’s start with the fact that I don’t have a favorite Doctor. I think that Christopher Eccleston has gotten short shrift in the whole deal because he only got one season.  And while David Tennant was arguably the most popular “modern” Doctor, it would not have happened if Christopher hadn’t gotten it all moving in season 1 MD (modern doctor).  He also is the only one to have a more contemporary get up, and had a very nice bad boy aesthetic going with his black leather. Apparently he wasn’t happy with the working conditions so made his exit and returned to the theatre.

SHE:  I DO have a favorite Doctor (so far, anyway) and he is David Tennant.  It’s not that I didn’t thoroughly enjoy Eccleston and Matt Smith (I’ll get to my thoughts on Capaldi later) but there was something about Tennant’s portrayal that completely drew me in.  He was a series of contradictions:  Goofy and serious.  Fractured and whole.  Social and lonely.  He had the longest run (as well as having both Russell T Davies AND Stephen Moffat writing episodes!) so there was a lot of time to give him some serious depth.  I think during his run we really got to flesh out the pain the Doctor feels about being the last Time Lord left.  Which is what makes the “Master” coming into the picture even more intriguing.  Tennant not only finds another Time Lord but the guy’s a dick. Bummer!!

LM:  What I think is odd about the Doctor is that when he regenerates he can remember all kinds of valuable information about his enemies, previous battles, and how alien technology works.  But he has no idea who is companion is and has no memory of their recent history (as in, like 10 minutes ago).  There was one exception- when Doctor the Tenth ran into Sarah Jane, who was a past companion along with a robotic dog, K9.  She figured in a couple of episodes- enough apparently to spin off her own short-lived show in the UK.
I did enjoy the Tenth (Tennant) a lot.  He had a nice range of funny, loving and vengeful (especially when he was without a companion).  Some of these episodes were kind of awkward because we were introduced to River (spoiler alert- his wife that was raised by aliens as an assassin to kill him in the future) while he was still managing a budding unrequited love interest with his companion Rose.  I’m going to say something controversial here- I’m not a fan of Rose.  Sure she’s plucky and all, but she strung her boyfriend along for ages when she clearly had a thing for the Time Lord.  He was a nice guy and she was a shit for being so calloused.  I also thought that the writers really wussed out in giving her a knock-off version of her Doctor to keep.  I think they wanted to figure out a way to make fans happy that wanted to get them together.  Get over it people.  He’s already got an assassin wife.

SHE:  Oh, I love the Rose!  Added bonus for me is that she’s married to Laurence Fox who plays DS Hathaway on Inspector Lewis.  Anyone who likes tame BBC mystery series should check it out.  He’s adorable.  She’s also currently in Penny Dreadful PLUS when she was young she was a pop star!  Love her!
I also really enjoyed her relationship with the Doctor (both Eccleston and Tennant but mostly Tennant).  She was fearless and determined and took no shit.  And I know she kind of threw over her BF for the Doctor…but come on.  He took her time traveling.  Who’s head WOULDN’T be turned?
I also loved Donna.  Tennant’s Doctor sort of shunned relationships after Martha Jones (she fell in love with him and got kind of needy, frankly.  He was like “Nope, not hurting another woman!”) so he insisted upon a platonic relationship with Donna.  Tennant and the actress, Catherine Tate, are friends in real life so their chemistry on screen was really fun to watch.

LM:  One thing I really enjoyed about this Doctor was the process he went through when he knew his time was coming to an end.  The Ood kept singing to him about it, and he wasn‘t ready to go.  I thought that was touching.  Towards the end he was definitely more profound, and more “human”.  “We’re all stories in the end.  Make it a good one.”

SHE:  You’re right, that was great.  I cried.

LM:  Then we come to Matt of the floppy hair, and bow tie.  At 26 he’s the youngest Doctor. Most of his stories are intertwined with Amy and Rory who both Sue and I love.  Because of that, I do really like his episodes.  I thought it was interesting that the writers made him a lot more huggy and kissy than the others. His predecessors were much more PDA-averse and now the new Doctor is the most PDA-adverse of them all.  What does it mean?

SHE:  We also both enjoyed that he would make comments about being relieved that he wasn’t a ginger.  Funny, because Eccleston’s Doctor WANTED to be a ginger. Nice touch.  One of the things I enjoyed about Matt Smith is that while he’s very silly and energetic, he also shows some profound depth.  At one point, probably in his second season, I remember thinking “wow, he’s a REALLY good actor”.

LM:  Each of these Doctors also have an arc throughout.  His is the crack in the universe.  For some reason, I really liked that theme.  Though in the end, I didn’t like that it included the Time Lords on the other side wanting to get through.  Keep your own universe people.  You’ve already expired in this one!
And now we come to Peter Capaldi.  As with all regenerations, I had to observe a respectful period of mourning before I could even deign to watch the new one.  Each time I felt very loyal to the old one and was ready to hate the new one.  And each time, I couldn’t.  They each have something very compelling.  Well done, casting agent!  I like his sartorial aesthetic for the most part.  And I like that he changes his clothes.  The others wore the same damn thing all of the time.  He’s also spending more time contemplating who he is, why he chose this regeneration, and if he’s a good person.  I think it’s interesting that he acknowledges that in some way, he chooses his face (Apparently this incarnation really likes that guy in the Pompeii episode…).  He tells Clara that the Doctor she first met (loved!) chose a face that either he thought others would like or reflected who he wanted to be.  By that, I would guess this one is here to be serious and grown up about these things.  I’m also a bit curious if they chose an “older” doctor just to take the “will they or won’t they” question out of the mix, and let us concentrate on other things.  He lets Clara be a strong character, which is fun. However, he does do a lot less talking about what he’s going to do and then dishes out the lessons afterwards.  I’m not sure I like that part. He is lonely as always, and I think this one might be the worst if left alone too long.  Also, so far, I don’t like his overarching arc because it’s not very subtle- yes, yes, everyone is ending up in the Promised Land with the creepy lady.  Got it.  I’m not sure I really care.  

SHE:  Linda, we are similar in that we mourn the loss of each Doctor before embracing the new one.  Capaldi has been a struggle for me to get on board with, quite honestly.  I think part of that is because it’s also been a struggle for Clara as well.  I like Clara as a companion a lot.  She’s darling and smart and adventurous.  She seemed VERY reluctant to embrace this Doctor (I read, actually, that Capaldi and Moffat had to team up and convince her to stay.  It kind of shows.).  She does finally decide to stick with him, but I honestly wasn’t sure I was ready when she was.  I think it took me a few more episodes to really get on board.  I do, however, love his sense of humor (he has some good under-the-breath one liners) and I’m always a fan of the Scottish dudes. David Tennant is actually also Scottish, but as Linda has pointed out to me, they didn’t want a Scottish Doc when he was on.  Whatevs.  I love the Scots.

LM:  I think the key question is-which Doctor would you most like to travel with? I think the Eleventh (Matt) might be the most fun, but if we got into some serious shit, I think I’d prefer to be with Tenth (David).  How about you Sue?

SHE:  Tennant is my fave, so I’d have to go with him.  I agree about Matt Smith, he WOULD be fun to travel with.  He’s super cute and seems like a goofball.   But yeah.  Tennant.

(My drink pairing suggestion:  honestly I’m not even sure if the Doctor drinks or not – and it’s been debated on the interwebs – so I’d suggest a pint or two of Brewster’s Brewing Company Britannia’s Brew.  Apparently it has “truly national flavours, including English Boadiciea and Sovereign hops as well as seaweed and heather to represent Wales and Scotland”.  Pretty much sums it up.)

Our takeaways:
#1 – We have become TOTAL Doctor nerds!  
#2 – I’m clearly living up to the Erokan motto “We’re funny…to us!” with my titling lately.  Sorry about that, folks.
#3 – We both realized that it’s not about being a “Syfy” fan necessarily…this is all about good writing and acting.  And as Linda said to me - it’s reassuring to know that when the Aliens do come, there’s always a Doctor out there to save us.

xoxo…hashtagSueslife